Needless to say, these instances of “non craft beer” being put in the craft beer section, while fun to tweet about, can often be chalked up to stocking issues. Occasionally beer overflows into an adjoining section, or an LCBO employee chooses to simply set a beer at which there is available shelf space and you end up with Shock Top, by way of example, in a section designated for Ontario craft beer.

“There are many different views and perspectives out there,” she says, via email. Others put more value on the size of brewery and ownership structure.”

Categories: The Politics of Drinking | Tags: , , , | Permalink.

Author: Ben

First, let it be said that I do think the LCBO is making efforts to encourage craft beer. Virtually every brewer in Ontario that I’ve spoken to notes that the people working within the LCBO are extremely helpful and supportive when it comes. Aside from being too bureaucratic and sometimes making some head-scratching decisions about beers that are and aren’t approved (NO LASER SHOW?!) , I feel the LCBO is a pretty damn decent place for craft beer.
And so I had to ask.{


Opinions will quickly vary on whether or not it relates to production methods, some idea of “quality,” size, or possession, and some folks think the word should be abandoned altogether. Personally, I’m of the opinion that the Brewers Association’s definition, although not perfect, provides a fantastic place to start in order to create some working definition here in Canada–and I really attempted to define the term within an August 2016 blog post.

What is the LCBO’s definition?
“We do not have a specific definition from a marketing and merchandising perspective and tend to operate with general guidelines — in terms of how consumers shop for beer,” Bujold says.

It is all well and good for we stout sniffing cognoscenti to debate the term from our collective mother’s basements, but shouldn’t the state-run liquor behemoth entrusted to dispense beers both macro and craft have a written definition of “craft beer” to guide their marketing and merchandising efforts?|Apparently not much.
First, let it be said that I do think the LCBO is making efforts to encourage craft beer. Virtually every brewer in Ontario that I’ve spoken to notes that the people working within the LCBO are extremely helpful and supportive when it comes. Aside from being too bureaucratic and sometimes making some head-scratching decisions about beers that are and aren’t approved (NO LASER SHOW?!) , I feel the LCBO is a pretty damn decent place for craft beer.

That said, given that the government-run booze emporium is one of the few places we could buy beer to take home much of its advertising and merchandising appears to have a relationship with the word craft.

Opinions will quickly vary on whether or not it relates to production methods, some idea of “quality,” size, or possession, and some folks think the word should be abandoned altogether. Personally, I’m of the opinion that the Brewers Association’s definition, although not perfect, provides a fantastic place to start in order to create some working definition here in Canada–and I really attempted to define the term within an August 2016 blog post.

But then there are such instances, like within the “craft beer” features in the pages of the glossy Food & Drink magazine or on the LCBO’s generally excellent site, where it is clear at least some thought has gone into the categorization of these beverages. These too are fun to bring up on twitter to rankle craft beer loyalists, but one recent instance; this Salute to Craft; got me to thinking. Here is an example where Mill Street, after a Toronto craft beer pioneer and now a subsidiary of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, has been listed among “craft beers.”
I have seen and shared a few examples where, for instance, the signs denoting the “craft beer” section of the LCBO are confusing, misleading, or sometimes just downright awful. I have literally seen 40s of Olde English put in the “Craft Beer” section.
“There are many different views and perspectives out there,” she says, via email. Others put more value on the size of brewery and ownership structure.”
I advised Bujold that I can appreciate that the average consumer might think about certain beers “craft” as they appear to fit in that category distinction since most consumers define it–e.g. they know where the brewery is and can visit it, the business is making beer with much more intriguing flavours than many “macro lagers”, etc–but, I inquired, isn’t it somewhat misleading to lump these pseudo craft beers in with the real deal?
Categories: The Politics of Drinking | Tags: , , , | Permalink.

Author: Ben

I spoke with Christine Bujold, Media Relations Coordinator, Corporate Communications for the LCBO, who agreed that the term craft beer is difficult to define.
Now this seems like a very reasonable response, and I’m aware that, as always happens when I write on this topic, some will be quick to say “Who gives a shit? It’s all just beer, drink what you like.” To those folks, I’ll say “Why do you keep reading my blog?” but also “I give a shit,” because I think it matters. I find that this flaky relationship with the definition of the category problematic at best. Given the LCBO’s efforts to educate consumers with a fantastic website and an expensive print publication, plus tastings and little tasting seminars, the failure to draw distinction between large breweries and independent ones is upsetting. At best, it seems inconsistent with the educational efforts and a little lazy and, at worst, it looks like another deliberate blurring of the “craft” line to be able to help larger brewers masquerade as craft beer.
If you need to have an exhausting and annoying conversation with a whole lot of beer nerds, bring up the topic of the definition of the word “craft.”

Needless to say, these instances of “non craft beer” being put in the craft beer section, while fun to tweet about, can often be chalked up to stocking issues. Occasionally beer overflows into an adjoining section, or an LCBO employee chooses to simply set a beer at which there is available shelf space and you end up with Shock Top, by way of example, in a section designated for Ontario craft beer.

It is all well and good for we stout sniffing cognoscenti to debate the term from our collective mother’s basements, but shouldn’t the state-run liquor behemoth entrusted to dispense beers both macro and craft have a written definition of “craft beer” to guide their marketing and merchandising efforts?
What is the LCBO’s definition?
And so I had to ask.

Published at Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:50:06 +0000

LikeLoading…

My own efforts however, the definition of “craft” seems to be something that we still struggle with here in Ontario. It seems, at the LCBO.
Given that the LCBO has a stated mandate to help local producers, it seems to me that just broadly defining “craft beer,” or allowing largely uneducated consumers lead that definition with their shopping habits, is helping the big guys erode local brewers’ market share and is thus actually in opposition to that support.
{

“We do not have a specific definition from a marketing and merchandising perspective and tend to operate with general guidelines — in terms of how consumers shop for beer,” Bujold says.
http://www.bensbeerblog.com

Author: Ben

What is the LCBO’s definition?
If you need to have an exhausting and annoying conversation with a whole lot of beer nerds, bring up the topic of the definition of the word “craft.”

First, let it be said that I do think the LCBO is making efforts to encourage craft beer. Virtually every brewer in Ontario that I’ve spoken to notes that the people working within the LCBO are extremely helpful and supportive when it comes. Aside from being too bureaucratic and sometimes making some head-scratching decisions about beers that are and aren’t approved (NO LASER SHOW?!) , I feel the LCBO is a pretty damn decent place for craft beer.

Needless to say, these instances of “non craft beer” being put in the craft beer section, while fun to tweet about, can often be chalked up to stocking issues. Occasionally beer overflows into an adjoining section, or an LCBO employee chooses to simply set a beer at which there is available shelf space and you end up with Shock Top, by way of example, in a section designated for Ontario craft beer.
It is all well and good for we stout sniffing cognoscenti to debate the term from our collective mother’s basements, but shouldn’t the state-run liquor behemoth entrusted to dispense beers both macro and craft have a written definition of “craft beer” to guide their marketing and merchandising efforts?
Apparently not much.

Now this seems like a very reasonable response, and I’m aware that, as always happens when I write on this topic, some will be quick to say “Who gives a shit? It’s all just beer, drink what you like.” To those folks, I’ll say “Why do you keep reading my blog?” but also “I give a shit,” because I think it matters. I find that this flaky relationship with the definition of the category problematic at best. Given the LCBO’s efforts to educate consumers with a fantastic website and an expensive print publication, plus tastings and little tasting seminars, the failure to draw distinction between large breweries and independent ones is upsetting. At best, it seems inconsistent with the educational efforts and a little lazy and, at worst, it looks like another deliberate blurring of the “craft” line to be able to help larger brewers masquerade as craft beer.


Published at Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:50:06 +0000

I advised Bujold that I can appreciate that the average consumer might think about certain beers “craft” as they appear to fit in that category distinction since most consumers define it–e.g. they know where the brewery is and can visit it, the business is making beer with much more intriguing flavours than many “macro lagers”, etc–but, I inquired, isn’t it somewhat misleading to lump these pseudo craft beers in with the real deal?
Opinions will quickly vary on whether or not it relates to production methods, some idea of “quality,” size, or possession, and some folks think the word should be abandoned altogether. Personally, I’m of the opinion that the Brewers Association’s definition, although not perfect, provides a fantastic place to start in order to create some working definition here in Canada–and I really attempted to define the term within an August 2016 blog post.

Given that the LCBO has a stated mandate to help local producers, it seems to me that just broadly defining “craft beer,” or allowing largely uneducated consumers lead that definition with their shopping habits, is helping the big guys erode local brewers’ market share and is thus actually in opposition to that support.


I spoke with Christine Bujold, Media Relations Coordinator, Corporate Communications for the LCBO, who agreed that the term craft beer is difficult to define.

Source: Beer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *